This picture is an exciting rediscovery. Burne-Jones's career began officially in 1856 when he met Dante Gabriel Rossetti and began to work under his influence. For the first few years he devoted himself mainly to highly finished pen-and-ink drawings. He began to paint in watercolour, and in 1860 this medium took over as his primary means of expression. Belle et Blonde et coloree sheds new light on Burne-Jones’s working method at this early stage in his career as he explores the potential of various media with a youthful innocence and vigour. The dress is painted in Prussian blue watercolour in contrast to the model’s hands, which are delicately heightened with oil paint. The artist has experimented with the light above the horizon which is seen through the open door; he has made the top right hand square translucent by treating the paper with linseed oil. (A technique much used by John Flaxman to make tracing paper). The work was then glazed in parts to accentuate and deepen the colours with gum Arabic and other varnishes. The early 1860s saw the production of over thirty intensely felt paintings, reaching a climax in The Merciful Knight (Birmingham City Art Gallery), dated 1863 and exhibited at the Old Water-Colour Society the following year. Almost all these watercolours have been traced, or, in the case of three, are known to have been destroyed. One, however, entitled Belle et Blonde et Coloree, until recently prove elusive. Unlike so much of Burne-Jones’s work, it was never reproduced, so there was no means of knowing the composition. The only records were verbal. An entry in Burne-Jones’s autograph work-list (Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge), under 1860, showed that it was one of the earliest of the series, and closely related to the well-known pair of watercolours illustrating Whilhelm Meinhold’s Sidonia the Sorceress, both dated 1860, which are in the Tate Gallery. The picture also appears in a list of recent works which Burne-Jones made in an early sketchbook (Victoria and Albert Museum; E.I-1955). This gives the further information that it was bought by John Miller, a Liverpool merchant who was a staunch patron of the Pre-Raphaelites and whose daughter was married to Peter Paul Marshall, one of the partners in the Morris firm. There is little doubt that the present picture is this long-lost work. It is only slightly smaller than the Von Bork watercolours and (as side-by-side examination has shown ) very similar in technique. If anything, it would appear to be earliest of the trio as the handling is more experimental, as if the artist had learnt lessons in painting it which he was able to apply with benefit to the ”˜Von Borks’. This would reflect the order in which the three watercolours are listed in the Fitzwilliam work record. There is also the evidence in an old hand written on the back on which it is possible to decipher the name of John Miller and the words ”˜Russell Place’. This was Burne-Jones’s address from the autumn of 1858 to the autumn of 1861, a period which spans the painting of Belle et Blonde. Conceptually the picture is what one would expect, an essay in the ”˜Venetian’ style that so many of the Rossetti/Burne-Jones circle adopted at this date. The details of the dress may have been taken from Cesare Vecellio’s Abiti Antichi, an important source for the style from which Burne-Jones made copies in the early sketch book in the Victoria & Albert Museum already mentioned. If the title has a literary origin, it has not been identified. It sounds as if it might have been suggested by Swinburne, who was on particularly close terms with Burne-Jones in 1860. ”˜He had rooms very near us’, Lady Burne-Jones recalled in her Memorials, ”˜and we saw a great deal of him; sometimes twice or three times in a day he would come in, bringing his poems hot from his heart and certain of welcome and a hearing at any hour’. ”˜Swinburne was passionate admirer of Meinhold, and this certainly influenced Burne-Jones’s choice of subject for the other two pictures he was working on that summer. Yet even if Belle et Blonde does have a literary resource, this is obviously not central to an understanding of it in the sense that Meinhold’s blood-curdling romance is central to an understanding of the Tate watercolours. In other words it is a more ”˜subjectless’ or ”˜aesthetic’ type of picture, and to that extend art-historically more advanced. Bill Waters suggests in this introductory essay that the model may have been of the Macdonald sisters. Agnes, the beauty of the family who was to marry Edward Poynter in 1866, does seem the most likely. As to the question of framing the two Von Bork watercolours are still in the frames which Burne-Jones’s father, a Birmingham frame-maker, made for them, and Belle et Blonde may once have been similarly framed. The original frame has been lost, but the one in which it is now presented is close to those of its contemporaries in the Tate (1). 1. John Christian, Belle et Blonde et Coloree [in :] Bill Waters, Burne-Jones - A Quest for Love, London 1993, page 43-44